I was actually less offended by the Bloom hatchet-job because he clearly doesn't understand him (perhaps deliberately, there's a whiff of patricidal rage there). The Cormac McCarthy one was just gross, though. This man seems to read looking for what might be wrong with a book, and that isn't reading.
Yeah, that one. He accuses McCarthy of pretentiousness, among other things. This from someone whose every word, every ill-dropped name, every outlandish metaphor is pitched to convey smug omniscience and superiority to his reviewees.
Not that it's a stance he invented, that or the singsong Euphuistic "here's what may be a fault, here's what may be a virtue, here's the fault recapped but moderated and this time I'm sure of it" Time magazine paragraph logic he never deviates from. But people have a choice of becoming telemarketers, car salespeople, things like that. And nice ones don't.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
proximoception) wrote2006-04-29 03:44 am
no subject
no subject
You mean the review from the summer, of NCFOM, right?
no subject
Not that it's a stance he invented, that or the singsong Euphuistic "here's what may be a fault, here's what may be a virtue, here's the fault recapped but moderated and this time I'm sure of it" Time magazine paragraph logic he never deviates from. But people have a choice of becoming telemarketers, car salespeople, things like that. And nice ones don't.