proximoception: (Default)
2012-04-10 02:51 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Done with grading papers, though there's tests coming in a couple weeks. By chance four of the last five papers out of this batch of fifty were A-range. I even A-plussed a couple to be encouraging, the course having lasted all year. Bizarre what reading a few good papers in a row does to one's mood - and sense of the outlook for the future of humanity. Various bad runs earlier destroyed some evenings lately, on the other hand. Might be something to say for setting aside some of the better-looking ones for last? Unless the interference wrecks the magic.

Even after the A ones I can barely write an English sentence though (see above, see right here). You are what you read.

Now I can't write it's on to my own papers. One professor, who hadn't handed back any of our work during the term, bought our loyalty by announcing at the end of the last class we only had to hand in a twelve page paper by the end of May, and nothing refined ("just some kind of piece of writing"). So there's that.
proximoception: (Default)
2008-02-10 12:57 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

What was worst about last term: how little people improved, from essay to essay, and how much of what they said was bullshit, or some painfully reduced or garbled version of what I or the professor had said, and how those that did think for themselves were...not doing it very well.

What was best was how thirsty they looked when, sensing some failure in general knowledge had rendered something in the text or the professor's take on it incomprehensible, I explained something pretty uncontroversial about history, or religion, or logic or science or storytelling--some connection affecting everyone. Their faces spelled not just eureka, but eureka at the possibility of eureka.

My main feeling about that is close to Howard Roark's about whatshisname, when he showed him his paintings. That Ayn Rand/Mr. Eddy within needs shooting over and over, eh?

But the other feeling was good.

The South teaches you that history actually matters--where and when it does, anyway. It's a valuable cliche that slavery enslaves the master as much as the slave--and nominal freedom didn't really take care of the one problem any more than the other. Whites and blacks were both trained into something down here that they haven't really left--I guess by definition those that can leave the mindset leave the region, or at least move to Atlanta or something? There's a glaze of 1680 over so much down here. Much more than in NC or Virginia. MUCH.

The white and black 17C mindsets both resist liberal conceptions of education. And for the whites, don't think I mean some kind of 'master' attitude--they're absurdly subservient too. The Deep South was the most vicious because slavery was more dangerous to the enslavers. The whites molded their society, their minds, their children's in response to the threat. Not questioning authority was big, not mentioning certain subjects--both fatal to thought, both surviving and thriving now that (non-legacy) racism is dying fast.

It's immensely sad and frustrating and explains a lot about US history that was otherwise kind of unclear. Cut this state I'm sitting in out of the country c. 1900 and the ensuing century plus would have been a LOT different. I really believe that. No Vietnam, no Hiroshima & Dresden, no Cold War, neither Iraq War (therefore no 9/11). Erase this one state, or even its two million most reliable supporters of the worst entertainable ideas, and we're most of the way to Canada. A lot of things now discussable would be undiscussable, and for a long time; a lot of undiscussable things would have been debated decades ago, and put in practice years ago. A lot of actions that needed the X number of willing victims to execute them would have come in at X minus fifty thousand.

I either need to get out of here or everyone else needs to come down and help. 

Eh, I'm probably just working myself up about it. Let's see how Obama does.


proximoception: (Default)
2007-10-17 02:28 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I'm having some trouble grading because I don't really have a sense of what D or F work is. Also, since no one is showing more than one or two aspects of the independent thought/command of English/structured argument trinity, I keep giving a B-range grade to anyone showing any of these--and most people are hitting at least one. This is a deeply confusing process. It doesn't help that they all chose to write 3 pages on the role of Faith in "Goodman Brown." That topic's next to impossible to get right (neither the professor nor I did, talking about it), and just as impossible to not make some obvious points about. I'm fighting the temptation to just grade based on their way with English, since the presence or absence of that is a) palpable and b) presumably will be pretty consistent across the term. But we're here to judge progress, aren't we? Or to reconfirm previous (and long-internalized) pigeonholing, I can't quite remember.