
"all the play, the insight, and the stretch"
Tempting to try to assign poets to Browning's Leonard and Roman and Agnolo, as with Dickinson's died-fors and Tennyson's knights. Was written within a year or so of his Shelley essay, wasn't it? And Michelangelo and Raphael are the two he's particularly concerned with...so, M=Shakespeare, R=Shelley? But Da Vinci's the deadest, so maybe that could be Shakespeare, and Wordsworth Michelangelo. I wonder if Browning heard some rumor that Wordsworth had praised his work (though not, of course, to Shelley). Who did Browning love? The Lost Leader, Caliban Upon Setebos, Pauline & Cenciaja (first and last) explicitly testify to those three's presence in him...Keats and Byron get mentions. And Smart and Euripides, of course. Byron and Shelley and Keats maybe. Or was Tennyson the praiser? And Shelley was of course married...to a woman with a mind; as was, some would protest, Browning. Total analogy failure? Probably for the best. And Browning played, stretched and insought all along his way.
And, of course, was not Andrea. Strange how the poem feels like nothing else Browning wrote, frequently doesn't even feel like Browning. Where are the knots and noise? The smooth and quiet make it seem confession, the speaking of a voice he never lets us hear again.
But this approaches gossip.
What did he think (--might he have thought--) he would have written? What improved infantine Iliad? What sensibler Sordello? And what is the verse like here? Nothing? Toward the end, in places, "Ulysses".