proximoception: (Default)
proximoception ([personal profile] proximoception) wrote2010-10-14 04:24 pm

(no subject)

Wrote a tiny poem c. 1998-9, among my very first, with a deliberate grammatical error, of which I immediately disliked the H. Rider Haggardness but couldn't come up with a suitable replacement:

The shape of she
Escapes from me
When finally I find her

But she's the kit
That fashioned it
And knits a fit reminder

How could that best have been fixed? I've come up with nothing each time it's called back to mind. I know it's not much of a poem - and you can see how into rhyme I was - but it still tugs as unfinished business. "Her modality" is too long, "Her shape, you see" is superfluously chatty, etc.

[identity profile] proximoception.livejournal.com 2010-10-15 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
[Names changed to protect the identity of david.]

me: Good grief. Did you see that? That's phenomenal.

Shingly the Worm-Turner: see what

me: me jehnal, mite

cor

SWT: i thought was fine to begin with. 21 y/o's or thereabouts can get away with bad grammar.

two verbs is troublesome

me: Eh, whatever. It solves the problem without sounding stupid, and that's better than I could ever do.

me: Also he adds more alliteration and alliteration is awesome as fuck.

Everyone knows it is.

SWT: sh and sl dont alliterate

me: slips/escapes and free/finally are close enough

me: Anyway why can't there be two verbs? You guys sound like Howard Roark removing collonades.

Fuckin' haiku police.

SWT: verbs are the meaning-weight of a poem! two verbs doing the work of one means two weak verbs

me: Nah they're fine/

It was a non weightbearing verb.

[identity profile] xhasyxhaxha.livejournal.com 2010-10-16 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
David is our Andalusian Bird-friend? I nearly stopped myself from commenting yesterday, just to give him the chance to do a better job of it first...

Whoever he is, that's a pretty elaborate disguise...