(no subject)
Feb. 21st, 2011 07:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
29. Love's Labor's Lost
30. The Great Gatsby
Fitzgerald is a magician. And here's another invisible house, albeit of the visible variety, and another instance of land flowing like water. And the glaring precursor of Citizen Kane, Catcher in the Rye, and some things in Crowley.
My high school theory that Gatsby arranged for Nick to come out, had set up his job and home for him, does fit the facts but seems superfluous. Ockham lops another.
30. The Great Gatsby
Fitzgerald is a magician. And here's another invisible house, albeit of the visible variety, and another instance of land flowing like water. And the glaring precursor of Citizen Kane, Catcher in the Rye, and some things in Crowley.
My high school theory that Gatsby arranged for Nick to come out, had set up his job and home for him, does fit the facts but seems superfluous. Ockham lops another.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-22 04:32 am (UTC)Anyway, the Tessier-Ashpool abode, as inhabited by 3Jane, made me think of you.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-22 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-22 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-22 10:22 pm (UTC)laudenum in the armoire?
Date: 2011-02-22 10:34 pm (UTC)I assumed everyone but me had read Neuromancer by now - perhaps you really should. Otherwise, you'll be the last one left. I dislike the techno-babble in all those books, but, you know - there's the Tessier-Ashpool abode. Also, stuff about proprioception that is somewhat interesting. Also, a great description of a wasp's nest.
You should read it so that I have someone who just read it to to exchange bon mots about it.
But Vicki Hearne, if you must.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-22 10:53 pm (UTC)I read it, it's just faded into disjunct impressions. I'll at least skim for the Tessier-Ashpool abode.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-23 03:52 am (UTC)All cyberpunk fades into disjunct impressions for me, I think. A few significant observations here and there, but no real bright throbbings.
Do skim for the T-A abode.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-23 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-23 12:22 am (UTC)I find it superfluous because Nick does know Gatsby's using him, even trying to bribe him, and helps anyway. Maybe he'd have reached some human limit and not helped him if he'd thought Gatsby had researched Daisy's whole extended family etc., but is that important? Nick decides that, at least in comparison to Daisy & Co., Gatsby is the good one, since his monstrous actions are dedicated to something and not half-assed assuagements of vanity like those of the Old Rich are. Would learning he'd been a pawn to start with, that Gatsby's smiles of reassurance had been calculated all along, have changed things?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-23 03:50 am (UTC)