(no subject)
Feb. 25th, 2014 11:29 pmThe most admirable thing about the show is how well it makes particular moments fit both the least-resistance, initial interpretation of viewers who don't yet know what's really happening, and the "oh right, yeah" realization of what was actually happening when you rewatch or think back. The most admirable thing about this most admirable thing is how the "remainder" is handled, those little bits of occurrence that don't parsimoniously fit the strawman interpretation. These bits are presented as texture, as things that don't happen quite straight because life doesn't happen quite straight; they lend, very ironically, verisimilitude, the belief that we're not being imposed upon by some mind's dry design. Whereas in fact they're straight as hell, and we need them to be, need everything to be pertinent to a sufficiently complex final explanation. Little dialogue, few gestures can be wasted or we lose that feeling of paranoia, of the malignant organization of all happenings, that we seem to love, at least in fiction. When the most random-seeming details turn out to be consequences of a single domino fall, that's just neat, and this method neatly underlines that neat effect. We thought only some things were connected, before. But it's all of them. Is this merely the sublimity proper to plot? Because it seems related to the making of god.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-26 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-26 04:27 pm (UTC)I mean, there's infinite things you can do to cover stuff up. It's just so elegant here, the coverups all have such elaborate throughlines.
Maybe this is double-neat when it infects the investigators themselves. There isn't a benevolent order confronting a malevolent one, in that case - in traditional mysteries we like the double remove from victimhood, where both we and those we follow are safe. Maybe we feel less safe when our people aren't, or less innocent when they might not be?