(no subject)
Mar. 22nd, 2014 11:08 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Expected to have trouble with Lolita but so far it's entirely disarming. I don't have Nabokov's number yet - Keats meets Waugh is how he seems, but that must be wrong because it's impossible. One puff of Keats proves the impossibility of Waughs.
A grouping of Waughs should be called an impossibility.
A grouping of Waughs should be called an impossibility.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-23 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-23 02:22 pm (UTC)Hence "a possibility of Byron's."
no subject
Date: 2014-03-23 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-03-23 03:31 pm (UTC)I once turned off autocorrect, but it was so much more maddening to have to fix typos. It really lit up for me how bad I type on Apple devices.
no subject
Date: 2014-03-23 05:42 pm (UTC)