(no subject)
Oct. 13th, 2016 09:48 amInteresting way to respond to those wondering if the Nobel committee even reads the writers they've been honouring these last couple decades.
Also we now can determine the mean age of the committee members who voted in the majority without resorting to much arithmetic. It is 68.41. Maximum variance of 2.5 years.
I wonder what my micro-generation loves that no other has been able to tolerate. Guess we'd be the last to know; the Dylan, Beach Boys and Fleetwood cohorts (somewhat overlapping) have never believed us when we've explained we're not onboard.
Also we now can determine the mean age of the committee members who voted in the majority without resorting to much arithmetic. It is 68.41. Maximum variance of 2.5 years.
I wonder what my micro-generation loves that no other has been able to tolerate. Guess we'd be the last to know; the Dylan, Beach Boys and Fleetwood cohorts (somewhat overlapping) have never believed us when we've explained we're not onboard.
no subject
Date: 2016-10-13 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-10-13 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-10-13 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-10-14 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-10-14 04:42 am (UTC)They're so fucking transparent, though. Even Pinter's very obviously wasn't about The Birthday Party but about his angry Bush-era doggerel and editorials, which were laudably leftist but could have been written by hundreds of others. Stoppard's always been at least as good, and has actually been putting plays out these last twenty years, some quite remarkable, but we all know he'll never win for being a centrist. They're such a laughingstock at this point, and they think Dylan will help? Possibly in the short term, given who's in charge of the tatters of the cultural establishment, but post-boomers will tend to see this as the moment the curators burnt down the museum after urinating in it for decades. And many will then assume it must not have been much of a museum.